What stakeholder group do you represent?
Refer to section 2.3. Do you agree with the proposed high priority artefacts to be developed to support interoperability?
Please provide comments (optional)
I would recommend the inclusion of data security into the high priority artefacts early in the process. this sets a appropriate tone and gives confidence in data security throughout the process.
Refer to section 2.3.1. Do you agree with the criteria for selecting existing interoperability resources to leverage in the framework?
Refer to section 2.3.2.1. Do you agree with the criteria for selecting the most important data terms to be included in the vocabulary?
Refer to section 2.3.2.2. Please indicate your preference from the following:
Refer to section 2.3.3. Would an agricultural traceability and product data ontology be a valuable resource to support interoperability?
Refer to section 2.3.6. What other standards should be considered in the list of recommended standards to support interoperability? (optional)
Cyber security
Refer to section 2.3.6.2. How can the issue of multiple location identifiers be addressed? (optional)
Perhaps the building of pyramid in which geo-identification starts at farm location (postcode or PIC) and is layered to include unique geo or regional identifiers (similar to wine regions) then state then national.
Refer to section 2.3.6.3. Are there any risks or issues you know of with the W3C Verifiable Credentials and Decentralised Identifiers (DID) standards? (optional)
Nil
Refer to section 2.4.1. Do you think any parts of the framework should be mandatory to use in the development of data systems?
Refer to section 2.4.2. Is the proposed governance structure adequate to support the development and maintenance of the framework?
Please provide comments (optional)
It lacks a cyber stewardship role
Please list any stakeholder groups you believe to be missing from the proposed governance structure (optional)
Australian Cyber Security Centre and the HA Cyber and Infrastructure Security Centre (CISC) to oversee the cyber security of the framework
Refer to section 3.1. How might these barriers be addressed? (optional)
Emphasising the return on investment (reputation, marketability) instead of focusing on the costs of entry.
Refer to section 3.3. Do you agree with the roles and responsibilities listed?
Please provide your reasons and alternative suggestions
Government has a key role in providing cyber security advice to supply chain participants. This should be included in 3.3.
Agricultural industry bodies also have role in promoting cyber security.